Monday, February 29, 2016

One Day Story - Take a Closer Look

Take a Closer Look

EDIT

Spectators gather at the Reticulated Python enclosure in the Charles H. Hoessle Herpetarium at the St. Louis Zoo on Saturday February 20, 2016. Construction completed on the building in 1927 and zoo officials renamed it in 2002 in honor of the former director.
A Gaboon Viper rests on the floor of its enclosure in the Charles H. Hoessle Herpetarium at the St. Louis Zoo on Saturday February 20, 2016. This African species has the longest fangs of any snake in the world; measuring up to two inches.
Megan Atnip of Breese, Ill. holds her son Layne, 2, against the glass of the King Cobra exhibit in the Charles H. Hoessle Herpetarium at the St. Louis Zoo on Saturday February 20, 2016. "We have been couped up all winter, so it is nice to get out and do a little exploring."

Layne Atnip, 2, of Breese, Ill. looks through the glass at a venomous Western Cottonmouth enclosure in the Charles H. Hoessle Herpetarium at the St. Louis Zoo on Saturday February 20, 2016. This was Layne's first time at the St. Louis Zoo.
Spectators watch a Reticulated Python consume a pig in the Charles H. Hoessle Herpetarium at the St. Louis Zoo on Saturday February 20, 2016. This species can grow to over 30 feet in length; making it the longest species in the world.

SELECTS 
Carvings adorn the entrance of the Charles H. Hoessle Herpetarium at the St. Louis Zoo on Saturday February 20, 2016. According to the zoo's website, the building houses over 700 species of reptiles and amphibians.

Layne Atnip, 2, of Brees, Ill. leans over the railing of the atrium in the Charles H. Hoessle Herpetarium at the St. Louis Zoo on Saturday February 20, 2016. The atrium contains tropical plants and a few animal exhibits including two different turtle species.

REFLECTION

The story about the reptile house at the St. Louis Zoo turned out to be more difficult to photograph than I had originally planned. I pitched the story about a beautiful building containing animals that most people wouldn’t find “beautiful.” I wanted to shoot some of the architecture and the animals inside. The final edit was supposed to be five to six images. I thought I had enough of the exterior architecture and enough of the interior and animals. After the first “WiP” session, it was decided that I didn’t.

After removing what architecture photos I did have, the class edited the story down to the interior and focused on the mother and son that allowed me to follow them. It was a extremely warm for a February day so the zoo was literally and figuratively a “zoo.” It was difficult to find a place to shoot the architecture because of the mass of people. It was also difficult to photograph the animals because most of them were in the backs of the enclosures and most of the glass was dirty enough that my camera wouldn’t auto-focus. I had to manually focus all of the cage shots and it was fun having people bump into while trying to focus a 180mm macro. After all of that, I think the story worked and I am happy with the edit that we managed to take out of what I had.

If I were to shoot this again, I think I would have better luck. If I could make it on a weekday I doubt it would be as busy and I would have more time to get the shots I want. I also made a few contacts at the zoo that would allow me to get better access to areas of the zoo that would allow me to shoot from the back, through the cages to the observers. I would also try get access to the roof so I could get a better shot of the roof tiles. I would also try to focus on pairing more images of the exterior architecture with elements from the inside of the building.

SECOND EDIT

I am going to attach a second edit that I think would still work including the architecture shots. I am going to start with the building entrance, then the pillar, and then the photo of the roof. The roof will be paired with the viper photo to create a transition from outside to the inside. Then the next photo will introduce the boy and he will take us to another part of the interior of the zoo. I think this will work and I am not sure why these photos were taken out in the beginning. After talking with some people after class, they said that they thought I had the edit that would work for what I pitched. I am just adding this in as a second edit for my own personal use.

Carvings adorn the entrance of the Charles H. Hoessle Herpetarium at the St. Louis Zoo on Saturday February 20, 2016. According to the zoo's website, the building houses over 700 species of reptiles and amphibians.
A support column shows the effects of years of weather and crowds at the Charles H. Hoessle Herpetarium at the St. Louis Zoo on Saturday February 20, 2016. The building went though renovations in the late 1970s and some exhibits are updated each year.
The curved ceramic tile roof reflects light from the unseasonably warm sun at the Charles H. Hoessle Herpetarium at the St. Louis Zoo on Saturday February 20, 2016. The building also serves as the home for the Ron Goellner Center for Hellbender conservation. The Hellbender is a giant salamander species that is native to Missouri.
A Gaboon Viper rests on the floor of its enclosure in the Charles H. Hoessle Herpetarium at the St. Louis Zoo on Saturday February 20, 2016. This African species has the longest fangs of any snake in the world; measuring up to two inches.
Layne Atnip, 2, of Breese, Ill. looks through the glass at a venomous Western Cottonmouth enclosure in the Charles H. Hoessle Herpetarium at the St. Louis Zoo on Saturday February 20, 2016. The cottonmouth is one of five native venomous snake species in Missouri.
Spectators gather at the Reticulated Python enclosure in the Charles H. Hoessle Herpetarium at the St. Louis Zoo on Saturday February 20, 2016. Construction completed on the building in 1927 and zoo officials renamed it in 2002 in honor of the former director.
Spectators watch a Reticulated Python consume a pig in the Charles H. Hoessle Herpetarium at the St. Louis Zoo on Saturday February 20, 2016. "We feed it once a month," said Levon Aghasyan, one of the research scientist at the zoo, "For many people it's interesting to see and many people gather."




Tuesday, February 9, 2016

A Little Princess





This is the edit that Halee Rock and I came up with out of the photos that were made available. It was difficult to choose the photos for this assignment because the story is about the young girl and being a pageant family. However, at the pageant, it seemed that the photographer focused more on the other girls that were participating. We decided to make an edit that focused more on the interactions between the little girl and her family. For the most part, the edit consisted of the girl and her father. There were very few that had all three of the family members in the same photo. Looking back on the final edit, I feel we should have had one or two more detail shots in exchange for some we picked. Two I can think of is the photo of the father painting the girl's fingernails or the one of her shining her shoes. Even though there are some changes that I might make, I feel that this was a successful edit from the photos that were available.  Without being able to talk to the photographer and fully understand what they were going for, Halee and I had to make our own story.



One major lie and a lot of truth

Bird by bird has one of biggest lies in history. It is crazy to think that this book is used in an educational environment. I think that there are or should be charges filed against the author. Everyone knows that strawberry jam is the best way to make a PB&J, not GRAPE! Get it right! Now that that's out of the way, we can move on.

I like how the school lunch chapter discussed something that is very familiar to millions of people and used it in an illustrative way for the writing process. Actually, it really fits into any creative process. Writing seems to be the best way to get an analogy to fit with something else. Most people learn to write before they learn to photograph, draw seriously, create music etc. Since we start with writing it is something that is more familiar to more people. Once something is related to writing, it can then be related to other fields.

The Polaroid chapter took a dark turn for me. I really enjoyed the concept of a Polaroid developing in phases. It isn't visible all at once. It seems as if someone is adding to a painting one layer at a time. The author described the child against the fence, then family appearing, and then the baboons with lashing teeth. It made me think of how we often see people and think we know their story or what their story will be and sometimes we pass on someone because we don't think it is worth our time or it isn't interesting enough. It really made me brought me down for a little bit. Maybe it was a combination of the music that was playing while I was reading the chapter. I don't know. Whatever the cause or combination of causes was, it really got me thinking. It made me think of a quote that I heard years ago. I don't know why it made me think of this, and I am not sure if it even applies, but here it is.

“Wanna make a monster? Take the parts of yourself that make you uncomfortable — your weaknesses, bad thoughts, vanities, and hungers — and pretend they’re across the room. It’s too ugly to be human. It’s too ugly to be you. Children are afraid of the dark because they have nothing real to work with. Adults are afraid of themselves.”
- Richard Siken

It also made me think of this one as well.

“The Edge...There is no honest way to explain it because the only people who really know where it is are the ones who have gone over. The others-the living-are those who pushed their control as far as they felt they could handle it, and then pulled back, or slowed down, or did whatever they had to when it came time to choose between Now and Later. But the edge is still out there.” 
- Hunter S. Thompson

The chapter in On Being a Photographer about selecting a subject had one point that really caught my attention. I am not sure if it was the intent of the authors to have such an emphasis this, but it was like a flashing light to me. In the chapter, they stated that the study of the history of photographer is really about subjects. This applies to other mediums besides photography as well. But, when we are talking about photographers, we define their abilities of how they covered X or how they photographed Y. It is an interesting way to analyze a person - by discussing their work. It happens everyday and in almost every facet of life, but do we ever really think about it. It links back to a line in the Tao of Photography. It talked about someone becoming what they photograph. In a sense, becoming inseparable from their work. If someone speaks ill of their work, it is taken as an insult to their character.

Another part of the chapter that I liked was how they discussed people asking them to "give specific advice on the choice of subject matter." What I took from this was that we, as photographers and also just as human beings, should start looking at subjects not as a noun, but as a verb. Stay with me on this. All too often, we look at subjects as objects. They can be people or places, but they are still a thing; something that is tangible. However, after reflecting on this chapter, I feel that we, or at least I, should start looking at what we photograph as different experiences. Now this could still fall into that noun realm, but it's all in the mindset going in. The transitive verb form of "subject" is "to expose or render vulnerable." This shouldn't be looked at as being a negative. The photographer should have themselves in their work so they can learn and grow from each experience. (Obviously with regard to ethical considerations).

"Now I want to propose another idea all together... The real you, is not a puppet which life pushes around. The real you, the real deep down you, is the whole universe. You cannot confine yourself to what happens inside the skin. Your skin doesn't separate you from the world, it's a bridge. But just as a magnet polarizes its-self in north and south but its all one magnet, so experience polarizes itself as "Self" and "Other", but it's all one. What you call the "External world" is as much YOU as your own body. Most people think that when they open they're eyes and look around that what they are seeing is outside... it seems, doesn't it, that you are behind your eyes. We haven't realized that life and death, black and white, good and evil, being and non-being, come from the same center. When you look for your own particularized center of being which is separate from everything else, you wont be able to find it. The only way you'll know it isn't there is if you look hard enough, to find out that it isn't there. It isn't there at all, there isn't a separate you. There are, in physical reality, no such things as separate events. People can't be talked out of illusions. If a person believes that the earth is flat, you can't talk him out of that, he knows that it's flat. He'll go down to the window and see that its obvious, it looks flat. So the only way to convince him that it isn't is to say, "Well let's go and find the edge." 
- Nothing More "Pyre" Excerpts from lectures by Alan Watts